The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. The attorney listings on this site are paid attorney advertising.
fact, the bill was enacted on June 6, as Ohio Revised Code sections . Marriage and Divorce Laws, an organization sponsored by the American Bar Association. .. the alternatives, "infancy" or "minority," have a technical meaning in. Any marriage between persons of the same sex shall have no legal force or effect of this state, as defined in section of the Revised Code, that extends the.
Learn the answers to common questions about marriage in Ohio. Who may marry in Ohio? Does Ohio recognize common law marriages?
What are the requirements for a common law marriage in Ohio? A common law marriage exists only if all of the following are true: The couple has a mutual agreement of marriage "in praesenti" presently. Both people are competent to marry that is, of age and so on. The benefits of all other individuals entitled on the same record. Because the claimant's proxy marriage to the NH appears to comport with the statutory requirements of Oklahoma, and because it offends no public policy of Iowa the resident State at the time of the marriage or Ohio the State in which the NH died domiciled , the marriage must be considered valid.
Even if the formal proxy marriage would not be upheld, the couple would be considered to have had an informal common-law marriage. This memorandum is in response to your request for our legal opinion as to whether the proxy marriage between Wendell C.
The information accompanying your request indicates that the parties, by and through their respective proxies, obtained in Oklahoma marriage license, and delivered a duplicate contract of marriage in the presence of witnesses and before Honorable James P. Neither Wendell nor Adyline was present in Oklahoma at the time the marriage was solemnized; instead each was represented by a proxy because Adyline resided in Iowa, and Wendell, a U.
Army Officer, was stationed in Europe. For reasons that will be discussed more fully below, we conclude that under the relevant law, this marriage would be considered valid. Although proxy marriage is considered to be unusual in contemporary American society, it is not unknown.
Proxy marriage has been defined as an attempt to comply with the statutory formalities of marriage. During times of war, as was the case here, this type of marriage proved useful to men who were away in the service when they could not contract a valid marriage in any other way.
Indeed, during World War II Minnesota enacted a statute expressly authorizing proxy marriages upon proof that the woman was pregnant. Although proxy marriages are still only recognized by many churches, the Roman Catholic Church, in Canons and , expressly provides for solemnization of marriage by proxy where the proxy is authorized by the absentee.
Whether such a marriage will be considered valid in American law, however, depends upon whether the state where one of the parties resides permits such marriages to be performed within its jurisdiction or, if not, whether the resident state will recognize such a marriage if performed in a jurisdiction where it is allowed, even if not permissible in the resident state.
Just Honest People. Hernia Mesh. Claimant and NH stated that they began living together as husband and wife in August in Ohio and had lived together continuously since that time in Ohio, West Virginia, and North Carolina. Slater and Rick Zurz are lawyers who are caring, courteous and professional. An individual is eligible for Supplemental Medical Insurance Benefits Medicare part B if he or she is entitled to Medicare Part A, is age sixty-five or older, and is a resident and United States citizen or lawful permanent resident who continuously resided in the United States during the previous five years.
Therefore, the threshold question in this case is whether Iowa, the resident state of Adyline at the time of the proxy marriage, would either permit proxy marriage or recognize such a marriage performed elsewhere. We found no Iowa cases which discuss the legality of proxy or absentee marriage in that jurisdiction. Indeed, there is remarkably little case authority on the validity of proxy marriages contracted anywhere in the United States.
Several law review articles have been written on the subject, however. With respect to Iowa, one commentator wrote that the validity of proxy marriage had not been tested in Iowa, but found it significant that nothing in the Iowa statues [of that time or earlier] would militate against proxy marriage by requiring the presence of the marriage partners at the ceremony. It is also noteworthy that no state has failed to recognized a proxy marriage contracted in a jurisdiction which permits this form of marriage.
See e. Barrons v. United States , F.
But see: Respole v. Respole , 70 N. One commentator wrote that "probably the greatest single factor compelling the use of proxy marriage is that of legitimizing children.
Consequently in light of these interpretations of Iowa law by legal writers of the period, it is reasonable to assume that it may have been possible to contract a proxy marriage in Iowa. If that is so, then it follows that Iowa clearly would recognize a proxy marriage validly performed elsewhere. Since the marriage in question was performed in Oklahoma, it is necessary to examine Oklahoma law to determine whether there was any obstacle to solemnization of a proxy marriage in that state. Proxy marriages were contracted frequently in Oklahoma during World War II although the statutes of the state did not specifically provide for such marriage.
CITY L. In that article, the commentator noted that the National Association of Legal Aid Committees named Oklahoma as the only state in the nation where a marriage could be legally performed without either the bride or groom being present. According to Howery, there were no apparent objections of a practical nature which would militate against statutory marriages by proxy in Oklahoma, because "such marriages have taken place with more frequency in this state than in any other jurisdiction, with the possible exception of the state of Kansas".
As Howery correctly observed, marriage in Oklahoma is based upon a contract, the two parties being married from the time they agree to be married regardless of whether or not they ever live together. See also: Tice v. Tice , P. At the time of the marriage in question, Oklahoma permitted a marriage license to issue on the affidavit of any responsible person with knowledge of the parties. There was no statutory requirement of the parties' presence; and prior to , no health certificate was required.
Although a health certificate was necessary after , the requirement could be waived by a judge of a County Court under certain circumstances. On its face it appears to meet the requisites of Oklahoma law. The marriage license, also in the file, authorized the marriage of Wendell C. Finally, as discussed previously, the Certificate of Marriage, which is signed by James P.
Diggs, Jr. In our view, this attestation of the judge is the same as a judgment which is valid on its face, and which could have been collaterally attacked only in the manner provided by law. Fowler v. Goldfeder , P. Hence, it appears that the proxy marriage met the statutory requisites of Oklahoma in It is important to note, however that even if the marriage did not meet the statutory requisites, it would be considered only voidable, not void.
Respole , supra. In that case, the husband brought suit against the wife to annul a marriage performed in West Virginia in while the husband was in India.
The court held the marriage invalid because the wife would not live with the husband upon his return to the United States; in face the marriage was never consummated. The court said that then result would have been different if the marriage had been consummated since then it would have been recognized as a common law marriage in Ohio, the residence of the husband. In a New York case, Ferraro v. Ferraro , 77 N. In that case, as in the case under review here, the statutes were silent regarding proxy marriage.
The court reasoned that since the license was validly obtained and a ceremonial marriage is presumed to be valid, unless the presumption is overcome, the Ferraro marriage would be considered valid under the law of the place of celebration and therefore valid elsewhere. As earlier discussed, the license appears to have been legally obtained, the contract was duly entered into by and through authorized agents, and the marriage was certified by a judge. As in most jurisdictions, Oklahoma law presumes that a ceremonial marriage is valid.